adspayVERIFIED JULY 31, 2026
adspay vs Kickbacks
Facts change. Every competitor statement below links to Kickbacks' own site or repository and carries this verification date.
| Question | adspay | Kickbacks |
|---|---|---|
| Developer revenue share | 70%; 85% for the first 500 devices | 50% |
| Publisher surface available now | Terminal status line | Terminal CLI and VS Code extension surfaces |
| Client license | MIT open source | Proprietary, source-available |
| Payment evidence | Signed receipts plus public Solana transaction links | Published payout total and payout batches |
Evidence, not adjectives
- adspay's 70%/85% formula and $1 USDC minimum are documented on Earnings and enforced in the tested backend.
- adspay publishes its client under MIT on GitHub ↗.
- adspay links confirmed payments on its public payment proof and publishes the receipt verification flow on Verify.
- Kickbacks states a 50% share, its available surfaces and its installation flow on kickbacks.ai ↗.
- Kickbacks describes its client mirror as proprietary and source-available in its public repository ↗.
Choose the product whose trade-offs fit you. If any statement here becomes stale, email support@adspay.fun and we will correct it.